Rune Central

The Official Rune Quake Message Board
It is currently Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
:shock:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
Homie don't play Q3, ya loser.

And PB gets hacked all the time...


The wonderful thing about your cheating allegations is that you will never accept any solid evidence that someone is "for real".

ProQuake cheat-free ... Punkbuster ... etc.

I know you don't know what this is, because you don't really have any clue about Quake --- but there is a Quakeworld client called FuhQuake with numerous security measures and they use it in tournaments.

There are plenty of ways to find out if someone is for real.

You are more in the business of making allegations and complaining than anything else.

It is nice you have found some other game to play.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
You're very ignorant baker. What you call "solid evidence" is swiss-cheese, hacked nearly on a daily basis. Punkbuster is not a pro-active anti-cheat program, it's reactive. And reactive at best means that it protects against KNOWN game hacks, or highly public hacks. It can do virtually nothing against someone creating their own hack and keeping it for themselves. Quake anti-cheat is the same way. PB gets updated constantly, so what does that tell you? People are still cheating and creating cheats and PB spends a lot of effort trying to keep up with at least the known hacks. That's the best we can hope for. It's not fool proof, and it is no where near "solid evidence" of someone being legit. You have no idea what you're talking about. But please, continue to be smug in your ignorance.

There's evidence of one of my so-called allegations just proven..what do you say to that?

Oy yes and btw, please grace us with your great wisdom, and tell us how to find out if someone is legit? I can't wait to hear your answer.

I'm an IT Security expert and deal with people trying to cheat systems on a daily basis, you're just a n00b.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:18 pm 
Offline
zop.runequake.com
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 8:46 am
Posts: 343
Location: Palm Desert, CA
PWNED!

_________________
a random mod server: zop.runequake.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
You're very ignorant baker. What you call "solid evidence" is swiss-cheese, hacked nearly on a daily basis. Punkbuster is not a pro-active anti-cheat program, it's reactive. And reactive at best means that it protects against KNOWN game hacks, or highly public hacks. It can do virtually nothing against someone creating their own hack and keeping it for themselves. Quake anti-cheat is the same way. PB gets updated constantly, so what does that tell you? People are still cheating and creating cheats and PB spends a lot of effort trying to keep up with at least the known hacks. That's the best we can hope for. It's not fool proof, and it is no where near "solid evidence" of someone being legit. You have no idea what you're talking about. But please, continue to be smug in your ignorance.

There's evidence of one of my so-called allegations just proven..what do you say to that?

Oy yes and btw, please grace us with your great wisdom, and tell us how to find out if someone is legit? I can't wait to hear your answer.

I'm an IT Security expert and deal with people trying to cheat systems on a daily basis, you're just a n00b.


You know when you have someone whooped when you get a response with ad hominems and with vague statements.

1. People you insist are cheating or have accused of cheating: Quazy, Slot Zero, Chuck, WeirdQ, Magnesium, Core, Viper and those are just the ones I remember; there were tons of others including some run of the mill players.

2. The first day I had broadband and switched my name to E 175, the first game I played with you present you complained that I was a bot and left (a rare game that I beat Ryu).

You forget I've seen your config file. I'll dig that up from my old computer post it here. That was worth some laughs and everyone will get to see what kind of "expert" you are at Quake. :P :P

For those that remember you, this of course, is not necessary. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 4:32 am
Posts: 60
Location: Ohio
Baker you are dealing with a person lacking a frontal lobe he has a 6th sense because there is no sign of the other 5.

_________________
[LB]We1rdQ, Woodensoul aka AFUKNBEATDOWN!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
We1rdQ wrote:
Baker you are dealing with a person lacking a frontal lobe he has a 6th sense because there is no sign of the other 5.


Hehe, I have made a quick Urdead sentence decoder to help. :D

Urdead speak decoder wrote:

Before:

I'm an IT Security expert and deal with people trying to cheat systems on a daily basis.

After

I am a self-proclaimed, self-taught network guy working in a computer store in a small town in Iowa and tell people who don't know where the numlock key is to not use "password" as their password and to never give their password to a stranger.

Truth Extractor:

My name is Urdead. I have Rune Quake autoexec stuff in my config. I do not know any programming languages. I barely know HTML. I do not know C. I do not know QuakeC. I do not know how to compile Quake. I do not know the mechanics of how ProQuake cheat-free works. I do not know how f_modified works.

I know little about that which I speak of. The fact I know little about that which I speak of means I am not knowledgeable enough to "lose" an argument or be proved wrong.

Despite having no credentials and having made no significant "works" (an engine, a mod, a utility) and no programming abilities, I know more about Quake than Slot Zero, JPG and Fuh.

If I decide you cheat, and I decide this about many people, there is no way you can prove you are not a cheater because I am the best Quake player ever.

Furthermore, I whine and complain about being killed by 2-frag HPB campers with 250 ping on servers with spawn shields. I will non-stop complain about this even on servers where camping is clearly permitted instead of spend the $10 bucks per month to host my own server.

I frequently have quit Quake and swore to never play/post in forums again, but yet I never leave.

Some people will believe what I have to say because they have not known me long enough.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 3:17 am
Posts: 105
.

_________________
MagnesiuM

Slot for president!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 8:42 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Orlando, Florida
Ah, the good old days.

:shock:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
Haha. Well wouldn't expect much from a couple of dumbasses. First of all, Slot has always cheated. Secondly, WeirdQ caught cheating. Proved you wrong again. As for the rest, you will never be sure they haven't cheated, with the exception of magnesium, who I never thought cheated.
Quote:
Hi, I'm urdead. I don't work in a "computer store", I work for a large 23-state corporation in Des Moines, Iowa. I have 15 years of networking and security experience, professional, and 25 years personal experience. I've programmed in many different languages, but really dislike programming. I even know how to use edlin...LOL! . Baker once touched a piece of code and then thought he knew it all. He thinks IP means "I gotta pee". How ignorant he is now. He has no idea how people cheat, yet he thinks it's impossible, because cheat-free is almighty! It just like saying, "I can never be hacked because I have a firewall". It's amazing how many people get hacked everyday because of this false and ignorant sense of security. He should goto work for one of the Universities who get hacked all the time. He'd fit right in. He never thinks outside the box. He doesn't realize that Angel himself has hacked cheat-free 3 times. He doesn't realize that programs outside the program can help cheaters, such as OS video drivers that produce wireframes. He doesn't realize that things like this are not seen by the client. He doesn't realize this because he ignorently does not think outside his lil box.


Now I know that those of you, Funkify if I remember correctly, who are computer literate know exactly what I'm talking about and understand the dangers of feeling secure behind so-called "protective" devices. So, really, I don't expect the dumbasses here to understand, in fact, I expect more dribble from tweedle-dee and tweedle-dumbass, so I'll make my point once and then be done with it, hopefully maybe somoene can open their mind a bit and learn something.

BTW,
Slot=Cheater
WeirdQ=Cheater - Proven
And everyone else could've cheated at any time, it doesn't have to be all the time. I was proven right about weirdy, And you were proven wrong. That makes me 1 ahead of you, back-stabber baker. You have yet to prove me wrong. And your lil cheat-free BS is definately not 100% solid evidence. Cheat-free is NOT 100% cheat-free. It's too bad you can't see that. But, who cares?

Edit: Here's what John Caramack says about trying to make Quake cheat-free:
Quote:
Nothing in online games is cheat-proof (there is allways the device
driver level of things to hack on)
(urdead: Hmmm...this looks familiar, messing with the device drivers...sorta like video drivers...hmmm...maybe I know what I'm talking about huh?), but that would actually be more
secure than the game as it originally shipped, because hex edited patches
wouldn't work any more. Someone could still in theory hack the closed
source programs, but that is the same situation everyone was in with
the original game.


IOW, cheat-free? Never happen. There's always a way around it, as Angel found out, and others as well.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 3:17 am
Posts: 105
urdead wrote:
Haha. Well wouldn't expect much from a couple of dumbasses. First of all, Slot has always cheated. Secondly, WeirdQ caught cheating. Proved you wrong again. As for the rest, you will never be sure they haven't cheated, with the exception of magnesium, who I never thought cheated.


http://forums.runecentral.com/cgi-bin/messageboard/discussion.cgi?forum=5&discussion=68

:?:

_________________
MagnesiuM

Slot for president!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
As for the rest, you will never be sure they haven't cheated, with the exception of magnesium, who I never thought cheated.


urdead post in old forum wrote:
To see autoaim in action, observe the player named: Magnesium


Yes, you are a blowhard with 23 years of using a mainframe and applying patches to Windows and read log reports.

You can find a lot of those old-timers in the parking lot during lunch hour at any given corporation, but that doesn't make them gaming experts like you have decided you are (and clearly are not).

You've made up non-existent exploits and then accused players of using them. Like accusing Quazy of using a Counter-Strike-like speed hack, something that does not exist in Quake.

And you have such great etiquette too. Like posting in a music forum about a certain members lack of teeth due to leukemia (or whatever he had to go thru).

A true non-expert who gets mad and declares himself an expert. And such a good and upstanding member of the community.

We all know you are no hot shot IT consultant like you tried to claim a few posts back, just a cubicle dweller. We've seen pics you post at TLTQ of your 1980's General Motors car to know this to be true.

So tell me: Since you lie and exaggerate just to try "win" silly forum discussions, what else does this tell us about your character?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
What a moron! LOL! I've been consultants for two different companies! I've worked on literally hundreds of networks. What is this? You think you know me or something? Let's talk about you. Let's see, zero professional experience, works at McDonalds and still lives with mommy, right?

I can't help it if you're jealous and you can't win the cheat-free argument.

Hmm...let's see now. It's been proven weirdy at least has cheated once, do you think it's possible for others to use an aim bot every once in awhile!? NOOOOO! Can't be!!!! LOL.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
you can't win the cheat-free argument.


What argument?

You mean like the demo of you getting your ass kicked by Core so as you are fleeing Core you go hide in the corner and then he finds you and you call him a cheater?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
Is that all you have? Because it amounts to nothing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
Is that all you have? Because it amounts to nothing.


What about the time where you made cheating accusations and your ficticious friend "Fossil" (which was also you) kept posting agreeing with you?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
What about it? And that has to do with....what?

What about that time you claim 100%-proven a person doesn't cheat. This is about you, sunshine. I just proved that one of those I mentioned has cheated. You can't seem to be able to acknowledge that people can and do sometimes cheat. But you're so dense, you can't even recognize a cheat. Like for instance, a player comes into a room, looks way up into a dark corner of a high ceiling and fires a rocket, so quickly and w/o pause, even as he's looking up, that the only way anyone can do that is if he had know where to shoot before he got into the room. Oh, but I think this is beyond your comprehension. You need to stick with flipping burgers.

Score still shows me ahead.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
What about it? And that has to do with....what?


One second you say you never accused Magnesium or cheating, the next post Magnesium posts a link to where you did.

You don't like profanity, but engage in it yourself.

You keep bringing up that WeirdQ has allegedly used a bot on a public server, while you, yourself, have done so.

I'll probably humor your responses as long as you have them, although I think we've long passed the point where a casual reader would view you in a positive light, which is what I wanted to illustrate.

Anger, big ego, hypocrisy, vanity, name calling ... you aren't much different than JL or the other crackpots we used to have lurking around Quake.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 55
Quote:
One second you say you never accused Magnesium or cheating, the next post Magnesium posts a link to where you did.


Ah...so? Maybe he did cheat that one time?

Quote:
You don't like profanity, but engage in it yourself.

Nice attempt to avoid and sidestep the issue.

Quote:
You keep bringing up that WeirdQ has allegedly used a bot on a public server, while you, yourself, have done so.


ah..alledgedly? No this is called "100% solid evidence" LOGGED BY THE ADMIN WITH 100% accurate results. And guess what, I told everyone I brought a bot onto Gooland, with the rest of them (everyone was botting, there was no doubt), even named it bot or somthing like that. I did not leave the server when I was getting whipped, come back with my playing name and try to pawn myself off as URDEAD the almighty, using a bot, like weirdy does/did. I did that once, on Gooland. Big difference here slick. I never came on as urdead with a toggle bot like I know weirdy has done many times. He sux without it. Oh and HELLO! WeirdQ was BANNED from playing at Shmack. Care to venture a guess as to why?

Quote:
I'll probably humor your responses as long as you have them, although I think we've long passed the point where a casual reader would view you in a positive light, which is what I wanted to illustrate.

That's because you've resorted to attacking me because you've lost your credibility.

Quote:
Anger, big ego, hypocrisy, vanity, name calling ... you aren't much different than JL or the other crackpots we used to have lurking around Quake.
Still with the attacks? Can't you answer the summons: How foolprrof, 100% cheat-proof is cheat-free?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 10:47 pm
Posts: 1612
Location: Ohio
urdead wrote:
WeirdQ was BANNED from playing at Shmack. Care to venture a guess as to why?


It was not related to cheating in any way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group